Commentary: Ks. Jim Ogle
.pdf of this article.
In Torg, Non Combat Interactions and Approved Actions
are meant to make combat more colorful by encouraging actions other
than attack or defense. They also balance combat-heavy characters,
by increasing the penalties for choosing to lower other attributes
in favor of Dexterity.
Yet, some GM’s might find that even with such Approved Actions,
players may choose to dump points into Dexterity anyway.
For such campaigns, this rule might offer a solution.
During round play, any round in which the villains have initiative
(as determined by the initiative line on the Drama Deck), they
may take advantage of the Approved Action for the round, either
singly or as a group. If the villain succeeds at an Approved Action
against a player character, the gamemaster may take one Drama Deck
card away from that character’s player, either from his hand or
his card pool (gamemaster’s choice) and discard it.
If the card is drawn from the player’s card pool, the gamemaster
can choose any card he wishes in the pool. If he chooses the player’s
hand, he must pick blindly- he cannot look at the cards before
choosing. Whichever is chosen, the card is then discarded.
characters can steal cards under the current rules.
This opportunity is rare, difficult, and doesn’t
make much of a difference during play. These rules
are meant to enhance such opportunities.
When using these rules, ignore the usual Villain Non-Combat
Interaction opportunity results (which appear in
the villain’s side of the initiative line, see
pg. 118 of the Revised and Expanded Torg Rulebook).
Active subplots, including Connections and a played Escape card,
are not in the player’s card pool and cannot be “stolen.” Glory
cards can be stolen, but this is usually considered to be in poor
taste, especially in Dramatic scenes (on the other hand, if the
player has been warned about the perils of focusing too much on Dexterity and
combat skills, and chosen to do so anyway, feel free). If the gamemaster
steals the Rally card (especially out of a player’s hand), he is
encouraged to laugh evilly.
When a villain steals a player’s card, the player can choose to
ante up a Possibility, marking it off the character sheet sheet
as if it had been spent (this expenditure cannot be canceled and
a Hero or Drama cannot be substituted for the Possibility). If
he does so, the card isn’t discarded, instead the gamemaster sets
On the Heros’ initiative, the player can attempt the same approved
action that was used against him, against the same villain. If
he can achieve a Player’s Call, the card and the Possibility are
returned (and he gains the normal benefits of a Player’s Call).
If not, the Possibility is lost and the card is immediately discarded.
A high Dexterity is useful in combat, because it allows
a character to attack and defend. However, it provides no protection
against Non-Combat Interaction skills (maneuver, trick, test, taunt,
and intimidate). Under the current rules, however, the
ill effects of such skills are short lived, and do not necessarily
pose a great threat.
Gamemaster characters can steal cards under the current rules,
but the opportunity to do so is rare, difficult, and doesn’t make
much of an impact on the game, as it is nearly always better for
them to attack, especially if they are facing a party of combat
By allowing villains to steal cards, the Non-Combat Interaction
skills become far more threatening. Losing a Hero, Drama, Opponent
Fails, Glory, or Rally is a significant loss, and thus this rule
increases the threat level posed by such skills.
This rule also addresses another issue with the current Non-Combat
Interaction skill mechanics. As currently formulated, gamemaster’s
have no real incentive to trick, test, and so forth as they get
nothing for it (players at least get cards). In terms of color
and portraying dangerous villains, it is just as rewarding for
gamemasters to describe an attack as it is for them to describe
a “taunt, feint, strike!” If the gamemaster’s combat
repertoire is limited to “I attack”, is it reasonable
to expect players to be any different? This rule rewards gamemasters
for tricking, taunting, testing, maneuvering and so forth, increasing
the variety of actions taken in combat.
It also encourages player usage of the Non-Combat Interaction
skills (and hence enhanced role-playing opportunities). Villains
will be taking cards more often, so players will be more interested
in earning cards to stay even. Earning cards requires approved
actions which means many more moments such as this: “I stare
him down, the light glinting of the steel of my blade.”
Villains can only take cards when they have the initiative. This
means that players will have a vested interest in revenge, and
a perfect opportunity for it. Players love revenge. When a villain
yanks their last Drama and throws it on the discard pile, the player
will be gunning for that villain, using the same Approved action
on him, as he did on them (as same Approved Action is in effect
on the player’s half of the round). This draws the players into
the game, as revenge is a motivator, and it encourages use of the
Non-Combat Interaction skills, to get back at the guy who got them.
Last of course, is the sheer value of defense. Using this rule,
a player who tries to dump all his points into Dexterity and fire
combat will find himself the victim of every wisecracking
shocktrooper, and the fifth time he looses a key card (a Drama,
Opponent Fails, Hero, or Rally) to a mook, he might rethink his
choices. Sooner or later, he will learn.
This rule makes other attributes useful in combat, both to protect
against card loss and to gain replacement cards. Focusing on one
attribute will open a character up to Non-Combat Interaction attacks
on other attributes, so balance is maintained.
The villains can only take cards when they have initiative. This
encourages the revenge dynamic, as described above, but also adds
in a bit of strategy to the use of Seize Initiative cards and effects.
The players might hesitate to Sieze Initiative to a new card, in
case the villains gain the initiative and take the Glory or Rally
cards. Or, the players might choose to keep the current card, if
the villains don’t have the initiative
In Standard scenes, the villains have initiative roughly 1/3rd
of the time. In Dramatic scenes, the villains have the initiative
about 2/3rds of the time. Obviously, Dramatic scenes are likely
to be rife with the use of Non-Combat Interaction skills, which
is how it should be.
This rule, as with most balance rules, depends on gamemasters
to implement it. Villains can take cards under this rule, but only
if the gamemaster bothers to give them Non-Combat Interaction skills
and then use them.
If the gamemaster doesn’t avail himself of the tools available,
then Dexterity, fire combat, and Damage Value
will rule, because they will be the only things that will matter
in combat. Combat-heavy characters are, on one level, a rational
adaptation to combats in which Dexterity and Damage Value
is the best and only way to win. By stressing other skills and
other Attributes, the importance of physical prowess and damage
is lessened, and opportunities for roleplaying are enhanced.
The Storm Knights website and
its contents are copyright © 2001-2010
by Jasyn Jones.